"use strict";(function(){var insertion=document.getElementById("citation-access-date");var date=new Date().toLocaleDateString(undefined,{month:"long",day:"numeric",year:"numeric"});insertion.parentElement.replaceChild(document.createTextNode(date),insertion)})(); FACT CHECK: We strive for accuracy and fairness. Yeah, but I may just be biased as I liked Troy a heck of a lot more than I did 300. In the late summer of 480 B.C., Leonidas led an army of 6,000 to 7,000 Greeks from many city-states, including 300 Spartans, in an attempt to prevent the Persians from passing through Thermopylae. Although Leonidas lost the battle, his death at Thermopylae was seen as a heroic sacrifice because he sent most of his army away when he realized that the Persians had outmaneuvered him. ! This is a brawl, No phalanx formation or group up, Can however gang up on him. ("Frank Miller 300 Movie vs. 300 Spartans History - Battle of Thermopylae") But, how much of the movie corresponds to what it was really like in 480 B.C. The only real way you can defeat a phalanx is by flanking it or having a huge numbers advantage. Psalm 10 says that the wicked renounce the Lord and do not seek Him. They're two different battles and I'll explain why Achilles' soldiers were more impressive. was part of the first Persian invasion of Greece. We need the best soldiers for the best army". Spartan training has been more defined than Achilles'. Hero cults were an established custom in ancient Greece from the eighth century B.C. First two are interesting though. It would of been defended by hundreds of men around the same number as the Spartans, probably more considering they were preparing for thousands of Greeks landing. Leonidas’ sacrifice, along with that of his Spartan hoplites, did not prevent the Persians from moving down the Greek coast into Boeotia. ), again launched an invasion against Greece. Achilles is good and most of their feats are comparable. For the wicked boasts of the desires of his soul, and the one greedy for gain curses and renounces the Lord. 50 men isn't enough to overwhelm or flank them.. (Roman Infantry later develops techniques to defeat even the pike phalangites from the front, but that was hundreds of years later). All Rights Reserved. Also saying take Achilles out of the equation and the myrmidon lose, is like me saying take away any of the named characters from the Spartans out and Achilles' army would slaughter them. (Judges 7:8-9, 12). Not a big deal though.. right? So why would the world favor a story about 300 defeated pagans instead of 300 who succeeded by the hand of God? I think Achilles and his men take every round. Twice at the beginning of the fifth century B.C., Persia attempted such an invasion. I see the Spartans winning this every round. I'm not saying that Astino would solo, but Astino and Stelios showed pretty good teamwork against 50+ men in that one scene. The Peloponnesian War marked a significant power shift in ancient Greece, favoring Sparta, and also ushered in a period of regional decline that signaled the ...read more, The term “classical Greece” refers to the period between the Persian Wars at the beginning of the fifth century B.C.
The Spartan King dismissed most of the army and formed a rear-guard of around 1,500 men, including his 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians, 400 Thebans and a few hundred others, many of them slaves. i honestly think achilles wins. Spartans all rounds. Almost everything that is known about Leonidas comes from the work of the Greek historian Herodotus (c. 484-c. 425 B.C.). They single handedly took the beach of Troy 50 to about 300+. Good thing Achilles is in this fight. In the late summer of 480 B.C., Leonidas led an army of 6,000 to 7,000 Greeks from many city-states, including 300 Spartans, in an attempt to prevent …
The Spartan King dismissed most of the army and formed a rear-guard of around 1,500 men, including his 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians, 400 Thebans and a few hundred others, many of them slaves. i honestly think achilles wins. Spartans all rounds. Almost everything that is known about Leonidas comes from the work of the Greek historian Herodotus (c. 484-c. 425 B.C.). They single handedly took the beach of Troy 50 to about 300+. Good thing Achilles is in this fight. In the late summer of 480 B.C., Leonidas led an army of 6,000 to 7,000 Greeks from many city-states, including 300 Spartans, in an attempt to prevent …
They were still on the beach. The Spartans are going to have an advantage in equipment. The 300 are great and all but stabbing bloodthirsty, ravaging Persians who show little technique is something that is not out of the capabilities of the Myrmidon. A lot actually, since the Trojans absolutely creamed the Greeks, and then proceeded to force them all the way back to the beach.
With his myrmidon. Directed by Rudolph Maté. was a king of the city-state of Sparta from about 490 B.C.
Most people are aware that the leader of the Greeks during the battle was Leonidas of Sparta. They are the elite fighting force in Greece at that time were constantly tipping the scales with their presence in Troy. Even the shileds they used were different too. Then we have 299 men by his side who could possibly replicate that feat. Leonidas and the 300 Spartans with him were all killed, along with most of their remaining allies. Achilles was focused on by 10-20 men at once and was dancing around them while charging uphill. Good battle but I think the Spartans take every round, but they take heavy casualties. Well taking out 1000+ men that are attacking you in a small choke point with only 300 men is pretty damn impressive, But taking out 200+ defending men that are uphill with bows and infantry with only 50 men is more impressive, @dewin50: I said > before I edited it but do you think that the War loving spartans would lose in the same situation as troy. Yet world history is enamored with 300 Spartans who did not succeed, without even a glance at Gideon and his men. No, they literally changed the game. Leonidas was the son of the Spartan king Anaxandrides (died c. 520 B.C.). chronicled nearly 30 years of war and tension between Athens and Sparta. Think of the massacre 300 men would do. Because they hate God. As he says, they've fought in countless battles and bled for him numerous times.
The spartans wasn't showing anything super impressive in the movies while Achilles showed great speed, agility and reaction. Same goes for the movie except the Persians stood a slightly better chance. They fought guys with shrapnel grenades. I don't see their shields to be enough cover for that. @kgb725: If the Spartans were in the Myrmidons situation?
In 490 B.C. Whenever they weren't there the Greeks suddenly stopped doing so well, yet when they were there the Trojans were forced back.
onward. Hector and Ajax are a nice touch. @monsterstomp: The Spartans was on the defensive and they neutralized the persian number advantage by holding a small choke point with their really strong Phalanx formation. The Persians found and beheaded Leonidas’ corpse–an act that was considered to be a grave insult. Though, actually there were over 7,000 Greeks with the Spartans against over a hundred thousand Persians… but those are still impossible odds. (This video is by WWUTT. Also, assuming (like they would historically at least) the Spartans kept in phalanx formation, they're going to slaughter 50 men. It was widely seen as being an allegory for the Cold War, with the freedom-loving Greeks being a heroic stand-in for the West while they fought against the slave empire of the East (ironically, the film was a hit in the Soviet Union). The battle was fought on the Marathon plain of northeastern Attica and marked the first blows of the Greco-Persian War. I don't think we can call them fodder. Leonidas and his men took on thousands and didn't start losing men until they fought the "Immortals". Dead heroes were worshipped, usually near their burial site, as intermediaries to the gods. The Lord said to Gideon, “Every one who laps the water with his tongue, as a dog laps, you shall set by himself. Edit: Just to say, I think Hector and Ajax would be capable of taking down plenty of Spartans of their own aswell. Likewise every one who kneels down to drink.” And the number of those who lapped and put their hands to their mouths was 300. Ten years later, during the Second Persian War, one of Darius’ sons, Xerxes I (c. 519-465 B.C. By turns charismatic and ruthless, brilliant and power hungry, diplomatic and ...read more, The term Ancient, or Archaic, Greece refers to the years 700-480 B.C., not the Classical Age (480-323 B.C.) Achilles stands a chance in round 1, giving the other 2 to Spartans. In September 480 B.C., however, the Athenian navy defeated the Persians at the Battle of Salamis, after which the Persians returned home. And then there's Hector and Ajax, Hector being a bit like Achilles only slower and Ajax being a big guy that could break the spartans formation with just a few swings with his hammer. (It’s in the Book of Judges, chapters 6-8). You’ve heard of the 300 Spartans, right? God reduced the number to 300 so everyone would know it is God who saves His people and strikes down His enemies. In 191 B.C., the Roman army defeated an invasion of Greece by the Syrian king Antiochus III at Thermopylae. In battle, they used a formation called a phalanx, in which rows of hoplites stood directly next to each other so that their shields overlapped with one another. Any one of the known Spartans can give Achilles a fight. This is a brawl, No phalanx formation or group up, Can however gang up on him; Spartans starts out spread; Round 1: 50 Spartans, Achilles has 25 of his Myrmidons Leonidas (c. 530-480 B.C.) the Persian king Darius I (550-486 B.C.) They're fighting on sand, up hill, against arrows and spears flying everywhere. As king, Leonidas was a military leader as well as a political one. The point I'm making is, they were the most elite fighting force in Greek Mythology, and Achilles was a demigod who was never once touched in battle, or challenged, and died only because of Apollos intervention. 50 fodder Myrmidons wouldn't really keep Spartans busy. A small Army of Greeks spearheaded by three hundred Spartans do battle with … "use strict";(function(){var insertion=document.getElementById("citation-access-date");var date=new Date().toLocaleDateString(undefined,{month:"long",day:"numeric",year:"numeric"});insertion.parentElement.replaceChild(document.createTextNode(date),insertion)})(); FACT CHECK: We strive for accuracy and fairness. Yeah, but I may just be biased as I liked Troy a heck of a lot more than I did 300. In the late summer of 480 B.C., Leonidas led an army of 6,000 to 7,000 Greeks from many city-states, including 300 Spartans, in an attempt to prevent the Persians from passing through Thermopylae. Although Leonidas lost the battle, his death at Thermopylae was seen as a heroic sacrifice because he sent most of his army away when he realized that the Persians had outmaneuvered him. ! This is a brawl, No phalanx formation or group up, Can however gang up on him. ("Frank Miller 300 Movie vs. 300 Spartans History - Battle of Thermopylae") But, how much of the movie corresponds to what it was really like in 480 B.C. The only real way you can defeat a phalanx is by flanking it or having a huge numbers advantage. Psalm 10 says that the wicked renounce the Lord and do not seek Him. They're two different battles and I'll explain why Achilles' soldiers were more impressive. was part of the first Persian invasion of Greece. We need the best soldiers for the best army". Spartan training has been more defined than Achilles'. Hero cults were an established custom in ancient Greece from the eighth century B.C. First two are interesting though. It would of been defended by hundreds of men around the same number as the Spartans, probably more considering they were preparing for thousands of Greeks landing. Leonidas’ sacrifice, along with that of his Spartan hoplites, did not prevent the Persians from moving down the Greek coast into Boeotia. ), again launched an invasion against Greece. Achilles is good and most of their feats are comparable. For the wicked boasts of the desires of his soul, and the one greedy for gain curses and renounces the Lord. 50 men isn't enough to overwhelm or flank them.. (Roman Infantry later develops techniques to defeat even the pike phalangites from the front, but that was hundreds of years later). All Rights Reserved. Also saying take Achilles out of the equation and the myrmidon lose, is like me saying take away any of the named characters from the Spartans out and Achilles' army would slaughter them. (Judges 7:8-9, 12). Not a big deal though.. right? So why would the world favor a story about 300 defeated pagans instead of 300 who succeeded by the hand of God? I think Achilles and his men take every round. Twice at the beginning of the fifth century B.C., Persia attempted such an invasion. I see the Spartans winning this every round. I'm not saying that Astino would solo, but Astino and Stelios showed pretty good teamwork against 50+ men in that one scene. The Peloponnesian War marked a significant power shift in ancient Greece, favoring Sparta, and also ushered in a period of regional decline that signaled the ...read more, The term “classical Greece” refers to the period between the Persian Wars at the beginning of the fifth century B.C.
The Spartan King dismissed most of the army and formed a rear-guard of around 1,500 men, including his 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians, 400 Thebans and a few hundred others, many of them slaves. i honestly think achilles wins. Spartans all rounds. Almost everything that is known about Leonidas comes from the work of the Greek historian Herodotus (c. 484-c. 425 B.C.). They single handedly took the beach of Troy 50 to about 300+. Good thing Achilles is in this fight. In the late summer of 480 B.C., Leonidas led an army of 6,000 to 7,000 Greeks from many city-states, including 300 Spartans, in an attempt to prevent …